From the Preface to Additions and Corrections
Supplement to
ANTARCTICA, 1772-1922;
FREESTANDING PUBLICATIONS THROUGH 1999
by Michael H. Rosove. (Santa
Monica, California: AdŽlie Books, 2001)
ISBN 0-9705386-3-4.
Used here by kind permission
of the author.
The
most important [error] concerns leaf 63 of Aurora Australis (entry 304.A1c). I erroneously stated that the illustration on the verso of the ÒMany
ShekelsÓ leaf was replaced by duplicate text, but the entire leaf except the
first word is Òvariant textÓ. Martin Greene offers the opinion—and he is undoubtedly
correct—that the Òvariant textÓ leaf was its first state. Martin points
out that the variant leaf contains not-so-vague statements that would have
offended identifiable solicited individuals who declined to contribute to the
expeditionÕs funds. When the text was revised, it also became shorter, and an
illustration was needed to fill the space. The ÒMany ShekelsÓ illustration
accomplishes that and is, in fact, the only illustration in the text,
supporting the notion that the ÒMany ShekelsÓ illustration was a late necessity
of circumstance. Both states of leaf 63 are available in modern facsimiles. The
1st facsimile edition (entry 304.B)
contains the ÒMany ShekelsÓ leaf; the 2nd facsimile edition (entry 304.C) contains the Òvariant textÓ (first state) leaf.
Two
additional very important points of interest concerning Aurora Australis have been brought to attention. Robert Stephenson examined the Pierpont Morgan copy at the Morgan
Library & Museum, New York City. ShackletonÕs accompanying presentation
letter states that 80 copies of the book were produced. This figure, somewhat
larger than the number of copies thus far documented in a longstanding and
ongoing census, and somewhat less than the 90 to 100 commonly cited, may now be
taken as the most closely correct estimate among several offered over the
years.
Granville
Allen Mawer, author of South by
Northwest: The Magnetic Crusade and the Contest for Antarctica (Kent Town, South Australia: Wakefield Press, 2006),
appears to have solved at least part of the mystery of the heretofore presumed
non-existent plate ÒA Giant Tick Was Investigating the Carcase.Ó Several copies
of Aurora Australis contain the
plate title leaf, but both John Millard and Mary P. Goodwin in their respective
introductions to the facsimile editions of 1986 and 1988 stated that the plate
was not known to exist in any copy, and still no copy containing the plate has
come to light. Such a plate would have illustrated Douglas MawsonÕs story
ÒBathybiaÓ. ÒBathybiaÓ was reproduced for The Antarctic Book, part of the 3-volume deluxe edition of ShackletonÕs The
Heart of the Antarctic published in 1909.
The Antarctic Book contains a George
Marston illustration for ÒBathybiaÓ facing p. 44 titled ÒGiant ToadstoolsÓ not
present in Aurora Australis. Allen,
upon careful examination of MarstonÕs busy etching, saw something easily
overlooked, a giant bug-eyed arthropod with multiple legs closing in on the
unconscious explorer just to the right of center. The unconscious manÕs
startled companions are looking on. The text on p. 38 describes the man as
prone; in the illustration he is supine with knees bent, but the term ÒproneÓ
is often used loosely as any position lying more or less flat. Another slight
inconsistency is that the arthropod more resembles a spider than a tick. Even
so, ÒGiant ToadstoolsÓ would appear to be a candidate for ÒA Giant Tick Was Investigating
the Carcase.Ó Possibly Marston had created an earlier ÒGiant TickÓ etching but
was not content with it and decided to create another, not in time to include
in Aurora Australis but soon
enough for The Antarctic Book. Or
perhaps he did create this plate in the Antarctic but considered the other two
etchings for ÒBathybiaÓ in Aurora Australis sufficient illustration, after the plate title leaf
was printed and made its way into a few copies.